Call us now:
Noah Barsky, thank you for including me in your post, it is appreciated. The Senate committee and corresponding letter are precedent setting. The Committee chair made clear that the United Health incident was a risk to National Security; the committee raised concerns over the acquisition by United Health of Change health and failure to manage security; the CISO appointed in 2023 appears to be unqualified for the role; the audit and finance committee failed to oversea cyber and board members had no meaningful cyber expertise.
Clearly board governance, oversight and assurance was a problem for the company. Bringing in Mandiant will not solve their problems, as Mandiant specializes in Right of Bang, not Left. As is the problem for 99% of boards today.
The use of MFA would appear to the least of United Health’s concerns. As demonstrated by this weeks cyber attack on a UK health supplier cyber is a major issue for CNI, what is the solution……….
@Thaddeus Dziekanowski Faisal Khan Brian D. McCarthy Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBA Ryan Buckner
Veritas GRC UnitedHealth Group U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Federal Trade Commission
#cybersecurity #cyberriskmanagement #cyberregulation
View Original Post
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7204436767146520576