A further example of the use of AI by a UK lawyer that backfired.

← Back to Blog

A further example of the use of AI by a UK lawyer that backfired. When a barrister submitted an immigration appeal using AI, they appeared not to check any aspects of the appeal. The submission cited authorities that did not exist, decisions that did not exist,

“I am bound to observe that one of the cases cited in Mr Rahman’s grounds … has recently been wrongly deployed by ChatGPT in support of similar arguments.”

“In my judgment, the only realistic possibility is that Mr Rahman relied significantly on Gen AI to formulate the grounds and sought to disguise that fact when the difficulties were explored with him at the hearing.”

Not just a case of AI hallucination, but of the submission not being fact-checked before submission.

@Thaddeus Dziekanowski Brian D. McCarthy Faisal Khan

Veritas GRC

#ai #aihallucinations

https://lnkd.in/eUKAppVT

View Original Post
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7385622672107540480