@Thaddeus Dziekanowski, the Paris AI summit held on the 10th and 11th of February demonstrated the rivalry and cracks between nations as the debate

← Back to Blog

@Thaddeus Dziekanowski, the Paris AI summit held on the 10th and 11th of February demonstrated the rivalry and cracks between nations as the debate AI development, deployment and use. While the geopolitical debates continue there is a growing void between political statements on one hand and how AI technologies are ‘created, deployed, and whose interests they serve’.There is an interesting dichotomy however when one considers the adoption of AI, that is not discussed. That is the reliance on the use of data and the outcomes or results that AI generates and to who benefits from those results. Who owns the data upon which AI relies, who owns the results that AI generates and who takes the benefits that AI creates? Therefore who governs AI?As this report discusses is ‘AI governance is increasingly shaped by geopolitical competition rather than by the expansion or consolidation of human rights or other norms-based cooperative frameworks’.Beyond geopolitical debate, for those that use AI. How do you govern its use, how to you manage the risks associated with AI models and how do we secure AI and the infrastructure upon which it relies?Brian D. McCarthy Faisal KhanVeritas GRC#cybersecurity #cyberriskmanagement #artificialintelligence

View Original Post
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7300425133876215809

Categories

Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Governance & ESG

Tags