An Australian Lawyer has been referred to the state legal complaints commission, after it was discovered he used ChatGPT to write court filings in

← Back to Blog

An Australian Lawyer has been referred to the state legal complaints commission, after it was discovered he used ChatGPT to write court filings in an immigration case. The second legal case in Australia where a lawyer has been referred to a regulatory body for using AI.https://lnkd.in/dQMi-7wy@Thaddeus Dziekanowski, in this instance the lawyer made fillings to an administrative appeals tribunal that contained citations to cases and quotes from Tribunal decisions that were non-existent. At a separate hearing the lawyer admitted using Chat GPT to write the documents.The Lawyer “…..accessed the site known as ChatGPT, inserted some words and the site prepared a summary of cases for him,” the judgment said. “He said the summary read well, so he incorporated the authorities and references into his submissions without checking the details.”The case highlights challenges with the use of AI, hallucinations and model poisoning, generated through the AI reasoning process. The cases also highlights the difficulties professions have with the adoption of AI, and the effort the legal profession has to go to ensure the quality of case fillings.Brian D. McCarthy Faisal Khan Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBAVeritas GRC#cybersecurity #cyberriskmanagement #cyberregulation #artificialintelligence

View Original Post
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7293183911906414592

Categories

Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Regulation & Compliance

Tags